<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		
		<title>Devonshires: Latest News</title>
		<link>http://www.devonshires.com/</link>
		<description>Latest News</description>
		<language>en</language>
		
		<generator>TYPO3 - get.content.right</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		
		
		
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 00:00:00 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		
		
		<item>
			<title>A new era of Garden Cities?</title>
			<link>http://www.devonshires.com/latest-news/single-news/a-new-era-of-garden-cities.html?no_cache=1</link>
			<description>A new think tank report from The Centre for Policy Studies has attacked England’s planning system...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="bodytext">The report, published on 6<sup><span>th</span></sup> May, states that there are over 100 acts or statutes, including some dating back to the nineteenth century, relating to planning and development, thus leading to lengthy and costly procedures as lawyers work around the legislation. It recommends moving towards a single consolidated act in order to reduce such delays and reinvigorate new development.</p><p>The report also supports the wider adoption of “sunset clauses” within planning policies which would ensure that Parliament review each law after a fixed period and assess its benefits.</p><p>In dealing with the current housing shortage, it cites the concept of Garden Cities and New Towns such as Milton Keynes as a model for a solution. The report also points to the Urban Development Corporation model established in the 1980s which helped to transform the London Docklands area through relaxing planning controls and taxes and encouraging investment.</p><p>For more information on this topic please contact <a href="http://www.devonshires.com/the-team/profile/Paul-Buckland.html" target="_parent"><span>Paul Buckland</span></a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<category>Paul Buckland</category>
			
			
			<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
			
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Devonshires advise on transfer of 50 homes to Tower Hamlets Community Housing</title>
			<link>http://www.devonshires.com/latest-news/single-news/devonshires-advise-on-transfer-of-50-homes-to-tower-hamlets-community-housing.html?no_cache=1</link>
			<description>The Devonshires Corporate and Property teams have advised Tower Hamlets Community Housing when it...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="bodytext">&nbsp;</p>
<p class="bodytext">&nbsp;</p>
<p class="bodytext"></span><span></p>
<p class="bodytext">&nbsp;</p>
<p class="bodytext">All three organisations have been in talks for a number of months and following </p>
<p class="bodytext">board meetings, resident consultation and approval from the local authority and </p>
<p class="bodytext">the Homes &amp; Communities Agency (HCA), the transfer normally took place on 22 April.</span></p><span></span><p>As part of the transfer, a Mitali Fund Committee has been created which will </p>
<p class="bodytext">provide grants for residents to encourage employment, educations and community </p>
<p class="bodytext">cohesion. Grants will be limited to transferring tenants for three years before </p>
<p class="bodytext">being opened up to all THCH households.</p><p></p>
<p class="bodytext">THCH’s chief executive, Mike Tyrrell, said: “This transfer is a perfect fit </p>
<p class="bodytext">for both THCH and residents of Mitali and I hope our new residents will benefit </p>
<p class="bodytext">from the services we provide and the excellent ties we have with the local </p>
<p class="bodytext">community.&quot;</p></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<category>Gareth Hall</category>
			<category>Elad Yasdi</category>
			
			
			<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
			
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>The Growth and Infrastructure Act becomes law</title>
			<link>http://www.devonshires.com/latest-news/single-news/the-growth-and-infrastructure-act-becomes-law.html?no_cache=1</link>
			<description>The Growth and Infrastructure Act 2013 has now become law, having received royal assent on 25 April...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="bodytext">The Act aims to reduce red tape and create economic growth and local jobs whilst encouraging business development, housing development and new infrastructure.</p><p>It is aimed that the Act will:</p><ul><li>Kick start stalled building projects that have been halted due to economically unviable terms of Section 106 agreements by allowing these agreements to be reconsidered.</li><li>Remove excessive red tape regarding householder development rights, encouraging small scale home improvement projects and ensure that neighbours are consulted when the new rights are exercised.</li><li>Prevent local residents from using the laws surrounding village greens as a tool to restrict development. Under the new legislation, locals will not be able to make a Town and Village Green application where there are plans in place to develop that land.</li><li>Generate a significant number of new jobs and new investment by removing a regulatory barrier to a £160 million investment programme in the gas network and giving developers of large scale developments the ability to fast-track major projects but keep community consultation.</li><li>Simplify planning systems that support sustainable growth and speed up development procedures by reducing the volume of required paperwork for planning applications, remove the requirement for consents from multiple government agencies and prevent delays by allowing applications to go to the Planning Inspectorate where a council has failed to meet statutory requirements to consider applications within the time limit.</li></ul><p class="bodytext">Eric Pickles, Communities and Local Government Secretary, commented on the Act. &quot;The common sense reforms in this Act will make it possible for local businesses to grow and to create the jobs and opportunities people need to get on in life.</p><p>It will unlock British entrepreneurship that has been jammed up for too long in red tape whilst ensuring democratic checks and environmental safeguards remain in place.&quot;</p><p>For more information, please contact <a href="http://www.devonshires.com/the-team/profile/Paul-Buckland.html">Paul Buckland</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			
			
			<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
			
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Devonshires launches a new consultancy service</title>
			<link>http://www.devonshires.com/latest-news/single-news/devonshires-launches-a-new-consultancy-service.html?no_cache=1</link>
			<description>From today (1 May) Devonshires will be offering a bespoke consultancy service to our clients. </description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="bodytext">This will initially cover four main areas:</p><ul><li>HR support</li><li>Company secretarial support</li><li>Workplace mediation</li><li>Training</li></ul><p class="bodytext">This service will be offered under the brand name of <a href="http://www.devonshires.com/what-we-do/devonshires-consultancy.html">Devonshires Consultancy</a>, but will remain a part of Devonshires Solicitors and separate to our new Business Advisory Service. </p><p>This service will offer cost-effective advice to clients on a flexible day or half-day rate basis and will incorporate advice from our Employment, Banking and Governance and HR teams. Please contact <a href="http://www.devonshires.com/the-team/profile/Nicola-Philp.html">Nicola Philp</a> if you would like more information. <br /></p>]]></content:encoded>
			
			
			<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
			
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>New Acas guidance published on collective redundancies</title>
			<link>http://www.devonshires.com/latest-news/single-news/new-acas-guidance-published-on-collective-redundancies.html?no_cache=1</link>
			<description>On 6 April 2013 Acas issued new non-statutory guidance following the Government’s changes to the...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="bodytext">On 6 April 2013 Acas issued new non-statutory guidance following the Government’s changes to the rules on collective redundancies that we reported on in our article dated 18 December 2012. In summary, the minimum consultation period has been reduced from 90 to 45 days and employees on fixed term contracts that have reached their termination point are excluded from these consultation obligations.</p><p>The new Acas guide includes case studies and provides a checklist for employers handling collective redundancies.  It aims to provide clarity for employers, employee representatives and employees in relation to collective redundancy legislation, the impact of case law and best practice.  It also includes an explanation of the meaning of “establishment” setting out case law on the issue and key questions for employers to consider when determining the meaning of establishment in different circumstances.</p><p><a href="http://www.acas.org.uk/media/pdf/c/n/How-to-manage-collective-redundancies.pdf"><span>The full guidance can be found here</span></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			
			
			<pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
			
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Dismissal following a second disciplinary procedure may be fair in exceptional circumstances</title>
			<link>http://www.devonshires.com/latest-news/single-news/dismissal-following-a-second-disciplinary-procedure-may-be-fair-in-exceptional-circumstances.html?no_cache=1</link>
			<description>In the recent case of Christou and another-v-London Borough of Haringey the Court of Appeal...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="bodytext"><span></p>
<p class="bodytext">&nbsp;</p>
<p class="bodytext"></span><p><span>In the recent case of <em>Christou</p>
<p class="bodytext">and another-v-London Borough of Haringey </em>the Court of Appeal rejected</p>
<p class="bodytext">claims by the two social workers responsible for the safety of Baby P prior to</p>
<p class="bodytext">his death in 2007 that they had been unfairly dismissed by Haringey Council in</p>
<p class="bodytext">the aftermath of the criminal proceedings against Baby P's abusers.&nbsp; Here</p>
<p class="bodytext">the Council dismissed the social workers following a second set of disciplinary</p>
<p class="bodytext">proceedings where the first set of proceedings (for the same offences) had</p>
<p class="bodytext">resulted only in written warnings.</span></p><span></p>
<p class="bodytext">&nbsp;</p>
<p class="bodytext"></span><p><strong><em><span>Background</span></em></strong></p><span></p>
<p class="bodytext">&nbsp;</p>
<p class="bodytext"></span><p><span>Ms Ward was the social</p>
<p class="bodytext">worker responsible for the care of Baby P from February 2007. Ms Christou was</p>
<p class="bodytext">Ms Ward’s manager.&nbsp; After Baby P’s death, the Council conducted a case</p>
<p class="bodytext">review (in 2008) during which the two social workers were disciplined under the</p>
<p class="bodytext">Council's simplified disciplinary procedure (usually used for less serious</p>
<p class="bodytext">disciplinary matters) and given written warnings for misconduct. </span></p><span></p>
<p class="bodytext">&nbsp;</p>
<p class="bodytext"></span><p><span>Following the Baby P</p>
<p class="bodytext">criminal trials, the Council’s new Director of Children's Services conducted an</p>
<p class="bodytext">internal inquiry into the Baby P case and the actions of the social workers</p>
<p class="bodytext">responsible for Baby P's care.&nbsp; The Director found the original</p>
<p class="bodytext">disciplinary procedure against Ms Christou and Ms Ward to be 'blatantly unsafe,</p>
<p class="bodytext">unsound and inadequate'.&nbsp; This finding led to a second set of disciplinary</p>
<p class="bodytext">proceedings being implemented against the two social workers which culminated</p>
<p class="bodytext">in their summary dismissal for gross misconduct in 2010.</span></p><span></p>
<p class="bodytext">&nbsp;</p>
<p class="bodytext"></span><p><span>Following their dismissal,</p>
<p class="bodytext">the social workers brought claims against the Council for unfair dismissal on</p>
<p class="bodytext">the grounds that the second set of disciplinary proceedings amounted to a</p>
<p class="bodytext">breach of the doctrine of Res Judicata and an abuse of process.</span></p><span></p>
<p class="bodytext">&nbsp;</p>
<p class="bodytext"></span><p><strong><em><span>The Legal Position</span></em></strong><em><span></span></em></p><span></p>
<p class="bodytext">&nbsp;</p>
<p class="bodytext"></span><p><span>The doctrine of Res Judicata</p>
<p class="bodytext">(a Latin term meaning “matter judged”) prevents a party from re-litigating any</p>
<p class="bodytext">claim or defence already litigated or adjudicated or that could have been</p>
<p class="bodytext">previously litigated or adjudicated. The doctrine is supposed to ensure the</p>
<p class="bodytext">finality of decisions and provide parties with certainty as to the outcome of</p>
<p class="bodytext">litigation.</span></p><span></p>
<p class="bodytext">&nbsp;</p>
<p class="bodytext"></span><p><span>The concept of abuse of</p>
<p class="bodytext">process is similar to the doctrine of Res Judicata and established that parties</p>
<p class="bodytext">cannot reopen a matter in later proceedings that was improperly dealt with</p>
<p class="bodytext">previously due to negligence or accident.</span></p><span></p>
<p class="bodytext">&nbsp;</p>
<p class="bodytext"></span><p><strong><em><span>Employment Tribunal Decision</span></em></strong><em><span></span></em></p><span></p>
<p class="bodytext">&nbsp;</p>
<p class="bodytext"></span><p><span>The Employment Tribunal (ET)</p>
<p class="bodytext">rejected all grounds for the social worker's claims deciding that there would</p>
<p class="bodytext">be situations where it would be appropriate for an employer to reopen a</p>
<p class="bodytext">disciplinary case (such as where new information had come to</p>
<p class="bodytext">light).&nbsp;&nbsp; In addition, the majority of the ET considered that a</p>
<p class="bodytext">second disciplinary procedure was fair in this case as the first procedure had</p>
<p class="bodytext">been 'inadequate'.&nbsp; The Claimants appealed this decision.</span></p><span></p>
<p class="bodytext">&nbsp;</p>
<p class="bodytext"></span><p><strong><em><span>Employment Appeal Tribunal</p>
<p class="bodytext">Decision</span></em></strong><em><span></span></em></p><span></p>
<p class="bodytext">&nbsp;</p>
<p class="bodytext"></span><p><span>The ET decision was upheld</p>
<p class="bodytext">by the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) who held that Res Judicata only applied</p>
<p class="bodytext">where there was litigation or adjudication to determine a dispute and that the</p>
<p class="bodytext">Council's simplified disciplinary procedure was so far removed from any</p>
<p class="bodytext">adjudicative process that the doctrine of Res Judicata could not apply in this</p>
<p class="bodytext">case.&nbsp; However, the EAT did make it clear that although a second set of</p>
<p class="bodytext">disciplinary proceedings may not be subject to the doctrine of Res Judicata,</p>
<p class="bodytext">disciplining an employee twice for the same offence would generally be deemed</p>
<p class="bodytext">unfair except in exceptional circumstances.&nbsp; </span></p><span></p>
<p class="bodytext">&nbsp;</p>
<p class="bodytext"></span><p><span>The Claimants appealed the</p>
<p class="bodytext">EAT decision.</span></p><span></p>
<p class="bodytext">&nbsp;</p>
<p class="bodytext"></span><p><strong><em><span>Court of Appeal Decision</span></em></strong></p><span></p>
<p class="bodytext">&nbsp;</p>
<p class="bodytext"></span><p><span>The Court of Appeal upheld</p>
<p class="bodytext">the EAT decision, confirming that the Council's internal disciplinary</p>
<p class="bodytext">procedures did not amount to litigation or adjudication.&nbsp; As such, it</p>
<p class="bodytext">found that the Claimants' argument (that the second set of disciplinary</p>
<p class="bodytext">proceedings was unfair as it breached the doctrine of Res Judicata) failed.</span></p><span></p>
<p class="bodytext">&nbsp;</p>
<p class="bodytext"></span><p><span>In addition, the Court of</p>
<p class="bodytext">Appeal considered whether the second disciplinary procedure was an abuse of</p>
<p class="bodytext">process and found that in these circumstances it wasn't as there were valid</p>
<p class="bodytext">reasons for reconsidering the social worker's actions such as the seriousness</p>
<p class="bodytext">of the allegations and the possible risk to the public.</span></p><span></p>
<p class="bodytext">&nbsp;</p>
<p class="bodytext"></span><p><span>The Court of Appeal further</p>
<p class="bodytext">held that dismissal after the second disciplinary procedure was within the band</p>
<p class="bodytext">of reasonable responses open to the Council.</span></p><span></p>
<p class="bodytext">&nbsp;</p>
<p class="bodytext"></span><p><strong><em><span>Commentary</span></em></strong></p><span></p>
<p class="bodytext">&nbsp;</p>
<p class="bodytext"></span><p><span>This case suggests that</p>
<p class="bodytext">employers will not be barred from instigating a second set of disciplinary</p>
<p class="bodytext">proceedings against an employee. However employers should act cautiously when</p>
<p class="bodytext">doing so as it is clear from the EAT and Court of Appeal decisions in this case</p>
<p class="bodytext">that disciplining an employee twice for the same offence is likely to be deemed</p>
<p class="bodytext">unfair in most cases. If employers are going to take this course of action, they</p>
<p class="bodytext">should ensure that they have exceptional reasons for doing so.</span><span></span></p><span></p>
<p class="bodytext">&nbsp;</p>
<p class="bodytext"></span></p>]]></content:encoded>
			
			
			<pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
			
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>How to deal with rent possession claims in the wake of the “bedroom tax”</title>
			<link>http://www.devonshires.com/latest-news/single-news/how-to-deal-with-rent-possession-claims-in-the-wake-of-the-bedroom-tax.html?no_cache=1</link>
			<description>Thousands of residents have been affected by the “bedroom tax” which came into force on 1 April...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="bodytext">This article will deal with two queries already being asked by Registered Providers: the first, how landlords deal with arrears incurred as a result of the bedroom tax; and the second, how to deal with ongoing rent possession claims where the arrears increase as a result of the tax.</p><p><strong>1. Arrears incurred since 1 April 2013 as a result of the bedroom tax</strong></p><p><strong></strong>Tenants affected by the bedroom tax are affected through no fault of their own but as a result of a government decision. Given that this is the case, where a tenant falls into arrears as a result of the reduction in their Housing Benefit and possession proceedings are subsequently issued, Judges are likely to be a lot more sympathetic to the tenant than if they are in arrears due to their own actions.</p><p>Affected tenants should already be fully aware of the implications of the bedroom tax and landlords should hopefully have an idea of which of their tenants can pay the shortfall and which cannot. For those that cannot pay the shortfall, landlords should have an idea of how they are going to deal with the inevitable influx of arrears cases that will arise and how they will help tenants to avoid incurring them in the first place. By having a procedure in place, landlords will hopefully ensure that affected tenants receive the assistance they need to properly manage their tenancy, limit the landlord’s loss of income and allow them to successfully seek possession of a property, if necessary. </p><p>In some cases it will be necessary and appropriate to seek possession due to arrears incurred as a result of the bedroom tax but this will depend on the circumstances of each case. We are in unchartered waters at the moment on this point, as it is unclear how far landlords will have to go to assist a tenant before the Courts will consider it reasonable to make a possession order. </p><p>Below are a few suggestions to help tenants avoid incurring arrears and also strengthen a landlord’s case should they need to seek possession of a property as a result of arrears incurred due to the bedroom tax:</p><p>a) Provide tenants with details of how they can downsize to a suitably-sized property and what they need to do to register for this. If this is done at an early stage and the tenant is able to mutually exchange or transfer, then you may be able to avoid any arrears being incurred at all.</p><p>b)&nbsp;Some landlords are promoting “lodger schemes” as a method of tenants avoiding incurring the bedroom tax.</p><p>c)&nbsp;Make sure that you maintain the lines of communication with tenants so that you are aware of how a tenant is coping with the shortfall and also to make sure that they are aware of any arrears and how they have been incurred. You should offer support to the tenant and refer them to external agencies, where appropriate to assist them.</p><p>The above suggestions are unlikely to be as straightforward as they seem because suitable alternative properties will not always be available and tenants may not engage in a lot of cases. However, as long as landlords do everything they can to assist a tenant in avoiding arrears being incurred and it is the tenant who refuses to engage, it will be difficult for a Judge to criticise them should arrears build up, as the fault will lay with the tenant. </p><p>Who is culpable seems to be the key question, so providing that a landlord is able to show that they have done all they can to assist a tenant and this is detailed in the witness statement, the landlord should be able to obtain a possession order.</p><p>For example, in the event that a suitable alternative property which meets a tenant’s needs is declined by the tenant, the Courts are likely to take a dim view of the tenant, who will be considered culpable for the arrears. </p><p>The difficultly will lie where there are no suitable alternative properties available for tenants who want to move, meaning that they are effectively stuck. The way to deal with this has yet to be seen.</p><p><strong>2. Existing rent possession claims where further arrears are incurred due to the bedroom tax</strong></p><p><strong></strong>Landlords will have a number of active rent possession claims at the moment and in many cases the arrears are going to increase at a higher rate as a result of the bedroom tax. Given the inevitable increase in arrears, switched-on tenants who are subject to possession proceedings (and are usually legally represented) are likely to request a transfer to another property to avoid incurring further arrears. <br />This poses a number of difficult questions, as most transfer policies state that tenants are not permitted to transfer when they are in arrears. So, how do landlords deal with rent claims where the arrears are just going to increase further as a result of bedroom tax?</p><p><em>a)&nbsp;Refuse the request</em></p><p><em></em>Each landlord will deal with a request to transfer differently. It is foreseeable that some landlords will refuse any request to transfer or mutually exchange if the tenant is in arrears and proceedings are ongoing. This is a perfectly acceptable position to take but you must consider how the Judge will view this standpoint at trial.</p><p>If a tenant was in high arrears prior to the bedroom tax affecting their Housing Benefit and the tenant has not made any effort to pay off any of the arrears before or after 1 April 2013 then the Judge may not have much sympathy for them and make a possession order. This will depend on the facts of each case, as detailed above. </p><p><em>b)&nbsp;Agree to allow the tenant to downsize</em></p><p><em></em>In other cases, landlords may need to make commercial decisions in respect of requests to transfer or mutually exchange in order to limit the loss of rental income. If a transfer or mutual exchange takes place fairly quickly after a request is made, the arrears will not increase too much. Also, the existing arrears could be attached to the new tenancy as former tenant arrears. It has also been suggested that former arrears could be included in the actual terms of a tenancy so that if a tenant does not repay them, landlords could seek possession of the new property on that basis.&nbsp; </p><p>The difficulty that arises with allowing a tenant to transfer or mutually exchange when they have existing arrears is if there is a change of landlord. In these cases, there would be no agreement for former tenant arrears between the tenant and their new landlord and landlords may have to just write off the arrears. <br />A further way of dealing with the arrears in the event of a transfer by a tenant to a smaller property would be to agree that the money the tenant would usually receive for downsizing (often £500 per room) be paid directly towards the arrears. If the arrears are not significant this may clear them or at least make a decent reduction.&nbsp; </p><p>The way in which landlords decide to deal with tenants affected by the bedroom tax who fall into arrears will vary from case to case and each situation must be considered on its own facts. However, it is important to remember that a tenant’s obligation to pay their rent remains unchanged. This means landlords are entitled to take enforcement action if a tenant fails to do so. </p><p>However, caution should be taken before issuing proceedings, as landlords will have to show the court that they have taken all possible steps to assist the tenant in dealing with the reduction in their Housing Benefit before a Court will consider it reasonable to make a possession order. Culpability is going to be a key question.</p><p>For further information please contact <a href="http://www.devonshires.com/the-team/profile/Samantha-Darlington.html">Samantha Darlington</a>.<br /></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<category>Samantha Darlington</category>
			
			
			<pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
			
		</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>